The CO2 that nature emits (from the ocean and vegetation) is balanced by natural absorptions (again by the ocean and vegetation). Any other use, in particular any reproduction, communication to the public or distribution of the content of this website, in whole or in part, for any other purpose and/or by any other means, without a specific licence agreement signed with AFP, is strictly prohibited. Mainly because termites produce methane, not CO2. All rights reserved. Avoid exponential while converting Double to String, OOP implementation of Rock Paper Scissors game logic in Java, Expressive macro for tensors; raised and lowered indices. Unless you live in a wooden house of course, then you better watch out for them.”. There are a great many natural sources and sinks for carbon dioxide. So the implied statement that termites have a much bigger impact on global climate than human industry is simply wrong. It only takes a minute to sign up. What is the best way to remove 100% of a software that is not yet installed? Termites put out around 1% of … Do active volcanoes emit more CO₂ than humans? The answer is, "none", because the CO2 they emit is / was already part of it. The meme features several large termites alongside an image of teenage climate change activist Greta Thunberg and a quote from this speech she made at the United Nations on September 23, 2019. Is the climate changing and why?? AFP has not obtained any rights from the authors or copyright owners of this third party content and shall incur no liability in this regard. Termites may emit large quantities of methane, carbon dioxide, and molecular hydrogen into the atmosphere. AFP and its logo are registered trademarks. For global climate purposes the various greenhouse gasses are counted as the equivalent mass of CO2, but for termite emissions the amounts vary greatly between wet and dry seasons. The meme was published in this Facebook post on October 22, 2019. “In fact, CO2 emissions have risen per decade by about 3.1 Giga tonne of CO2, pretty much what the CO2 emissions from termites are per year. Furthermore, termites produce less than 15% of the global methane per year: ... Is pollution bad? Can it be justified that an economic contraction of 11.3% is "the largest fall for more than 300 years"? Are we in a low CO2 period, compared to the last 590 million years? Complicating this even further is the fact that bacteria in the termite mounds seem to be oxidising anything from 20% to 80% the methane into CO2. So if you are comparing the tailpipe emissions of termites with human industry without regard to the source of the carbon then the answer is "we don't know". Human activities—mostly burning of coal and other fossil fuels, but also cement production, deforestation and … Burn them, and they give off carbon dioxide much more rapidly. And thats before we get on to M1 vs M2 vs M3. Leaving aside the fact that termite CO2 production is on few, if any, secondary school syllabuses, its more complicated than that. Limitations of Monte Carlo simulations in finance. I trust a good answer will consider CO2e and not just dismiss the claim on the grounds that termites emit CH4 rather than CO2. Why did MacOS Classic choose the colon as a path separator? Is whatever I see on the internet temporarily present in the RAM? As much as 2 x 1014 grams of molecular hydrogen may also be produced. Termites are not burning fossil fuels. In fact, human emit 26 gigatonnes of CO2 per year while CO2 in the atmosphere is rising by only 15 gigatonnes per year - much of human CO2 emissions … Is there more forest in the Northern Hemisphere now than 100 years ago? @Accumulation: Look at it this way: How much CO2 do termites add to the biosphere. In fact, several individual U.S. states emit more carbon dioxide in a year than all the volcanoes on the planet combined do. All rights reserved. “Importantly, termite populations do not seem to increase globally, so we really do not have to worry about them. Burn them, and they give off carbon dioxide much more rapidly. The CO2 [is] rising so rapidly that plants cannot keep up. reply from a potential PhD advisor? A meme shared hundreds of times in multiple posts on Facebook and Twitter claims that termites produce 10 times more carbon dioxide than humans in a … “Hence, termites are de facto carbon neutral,” he said. Leaving aside all the questions about exactly how much methane and CO2 comes out of termite mounds, the real issue is that we are burning fossil fuels, and hence introducing new carbon into the global carbon cycle, while termites, along with fungi and all the other decomposition processes, merely move the same carbon around the cycle. NOAA Climate.gov cartoon by Emily Greenhalgh. I mistakenly revealed name of new company to HR of current company. Below is a screenshot of the table of these emissions estimates, which appears on page 425 of the study: The Global Carbon Project, a US-based environmental research organisation, stated in this 2018 report there were 36.2 Gigatonnes of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry in 2017. don't have good estimates for the global amount, MAINTENANCE WARNING: Possible downtime early morning Dec 2/4/9 UTC (8:30PM…, “Question closed” notifications experiment results and graduation. Hence, the human CO2 emissions increase every year by 1/10 of the global termite CO2 emissions. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. More Evidence CO2 is Not The Problem: Termites Emit Ten Times More CO2 Than Humans During the 20th century, the earth warmed 0.6 degree Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit), but that warming has been wiped out in a single year with a drop of 0.63 degree C. (1.13 F.) in 2007. Copyright AFP 2017-2020. So from a global climate point of view the statement is flat wrong. Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It's simple science, taught in high school. Copyright AFP 2017-2020.